The Perfect Car List For a Game

The Place for Car enthusiasts to chat about the cars they like and dislike
User avatar
Miao
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Res Nullius
Contact:

Toyota TS010 CN.007 '93
Toyota TS010 CN.007 '93.jpg
The Toyota TS010 was a Group C racing car built by Toyota for the Sportscar World Championship, All Japan Sports Prototype Championship, and the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

As one of the very few manufacturers Toyota was active in Group C from the beginning in 1982 all the way to the end in 1993. For the most part the Japanese team struggled to be competitive, but in the end their persistence paid off. Helped by a drastic rule change, Toyota finally bridged the gap with the competition. The new regulations were based around the 3.5 litre displacement limit also used in Formula 1 and created by the FIA to lure some of the major manufacturers from the hugely popular sports car racing to F1. In 1990 and 1991 the 3.5 litre cars were run side by side with the existing Group C cars, but from 1992 onwards only new cars were allowed to race. As one of the last manufacturers Toyota jumped ship and introduced their 3.5 litre Group C car, the TS010, during the last race of the 1991 season.

Toyota broke with tradition by employing a non-Japanese designer to pen the TS010. Having previously developed the Le Mans winning Jaguars, Tony Southgate was the ideal candidate to bring the Japanese manufacturer closer to the top. He was faced with an easier task than the engine designers as the chassis and aero regulations had not been modified much. Most importantly this meant that 'ground effects' was still completely legal. Inspired by the TS010's elegant predecessors, Southgate came up with a simple but effective shape. The new body panels covered a state of the art carbon fibre monocoque, suspended by double wishbones all around.

For the company's engine designers the TS010 meant a fresh start as the existing twin-Turbo V8 engine was no longer eligible. Perhaps inspired by the Renault and Ferrari F1 engines of the day they drafted up a V10 engine with a five valves per cylinder head. The new engine was constructed from aluminium alloys and had a V-angle of 72-degrees. At full pelt, it produced well over 700 hp, but for reliability reasons the performance was pegged back to around 600 hp for long distance races. Mated to a six speed gearbox, the engine was bolted to the monocoque, although not as a fully stressed member. The completed machine weighed in at 750 kg; the minimum weight dictated by the regulations.

One of three TS010s constructed specifically for the 1993 24 Hours of Le Mans, the CN.007 was entered for Eddie Irvine, Toshio Suzuki and Masanori Sekiya. After starting second on the grid, chassis 007 eventually ended the race in fourth. This was the final outing for the TS010 as the cars were rendered obsolete by rule changes. Recently restored, this TS010 was brought to the 2013 Goodwood Festival of Speed where it starred alongside the subsequent TS020 and TS030 sports racers.

Specs:
Toyota TS010 CN.007 '93 specs.png
Toyota TS010 CN.007 '93 specs.png (5.72 KiB) Viewed 1706 times
Toyota TS010 CN.007 '93 rear.jpg
Toyota TS010 CN.007 '93 side.jpg
Toyota TS010 CN.007 '93 interior.jpg
Nogai211 wrote:The only reason PC is better than Console is because it has Civilization V!
Image
User avatar
Miao
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Res Nullius
Contact:

Lola B08/60 Aston Martin '08
Lola B0860 Aston Martin '08.jpg
One of the biggest surprises of the build-up to the 2008 endurance racing season was the announcement that Aston Martin would enter prototype racing as an engine supplier. This comes on top of their presence in all four international GT categories. The choice of the latest Lola chassis to house the engine did not bring back so pleasant memories of the two ill-fated Aston Martin engined Lola T70s that lasted less than an hour in the 1967 24 Hours of Le Mans. This time round the engine was not a prototype, but instead a seasoned and successful powerplant that had already been raced at Le Mans several times.

Aston Martin's surprise decision came about after a slight modification of the regulations for the 2008 season, which gave production based engines a slight performance advantage by virtue of a restrictor break compared to bespoke racing engines. Aston Martin's six litre V12 engine was built in sufficient numbers and displaces just under the limit of six litres. Furthermore it had already been developed and used in the highly successful DBR9, which won the GT1 class at Le Mans in 2007 and many other major races since 2005.

There were several drawbacks to using a production engine in general and this V12 in particular. Reliability could have been an issue, but engine failure has been a very rare occurrence with the DBR9s. A bigger worry was the higher weight of the engine compared to comparable engines developed specifically for racing. A particular problem with the Aston Martin engine was the relatively tight V-angle, which affects the car's centre of gravity as most of the weight is quite high up in the engine. Aston Martin believed the 30 hp gained by the restrictor break would make up for that.

What was completely new is the Lola B08/60 chassis, the English company's first fixed head sports racer since the Group C era. The carbon fibre roof did not hide the fact that the new car shares many design cues with the previous generation of open LMP1 and LMP2 Lolas, which was also designed by Julian Sole. The final shape was created by using the latest Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software as well as extensive wind-tunnel testing and Lola believed that both the new LMP1 and LMP2 chassis would be even more efficient. The B08/60 also featured a completely new monocoque and suspension compared to its predecessors.

Lola's new LMP1 chassis was not designed with the Aston Martin engine in mind and needed to adjustments because of the length of the V12. The car featured what was effectively a bespoke rear-end with a XTrac six-speed sequential gearbox in place of the standard Lola gearbox offered to 'regular' customers. The car was completed in time for some private testing before the car was shipped to Paul Ricard for the official Le Mans Series test. The Lola Aston was commissioned by Czech privateer team Charouz Racing who had previously raced a Judd engined Lola.

At Paul Ricard the brand new Lola Aston was immediately on the pace of the other petrol engined rivals but the diesel engined Audis still proved too quick. The good form was carried over to the season opening Le Mans Series race at Barcelona where an impressive third place was clinched behind a Peugeot and an Audi. During the following two races the team struggled to get the setup sorted. The problems were very persistent and required extensive re-calibration back at Lola. Apparently the car was on the alignment jig for nearly a week between the Le Mans test and the race.

During the qualification sessions for the 24 Hours of Le Mans race it was clear that the problems were sorted. The Lola clinched sixth place on the grid ahead of one of the Audis with a time of 3:25,158; over 11 seconds faster than in the test. Unfortunately the Aston engined prototype was involved in an accident early in the race, resulting in lengthy repairs. A very strong run in the remainder of the race saw the stylish coupe fight back to an impressive ninth overall. They were beaten only by two other petrol engined machines and the six diesel powered Audis and Peugeots.

For the final two Le Mans Series races of the season a brand new tub was built, which included the lessons learned with the first car. It proved quicker still, setting the third qualifying time at the Nürburgring round and eventually finishing fifth behind the four diesels. The season finale at Silverstone brought even more success as the Lola Aston finished second after starting from fifth on the grid. During the messy race the Charouz team made no mistakes and for a long time led the race as the Audis and Peugeots fought fiercely for the championship. The team, fittingly, finished fifth in the championship.

Fortunately there was little during the 2008 season that reminded of the previous Lola and Aston Martin collaboration. Beating seasoned prototype racers and teams in the maiden season was quite an achievement. For Lola it was also a great way to celebrate the company's fiftieth anniversary. At the end of the year Antonin Charouz put both of the chassis up for sale and one will be raced by the very competent Speedy-Sebah team in 2009. It looks like Aston Martin has really gotten a taste of prototype racing as the latest rumors suggest that they are building a completely new car for 2009 with backing from Charouz and Gulf.

Specs:
Lola B0860 Aston Martin '08 specs.png
Lola B0860 Aston Martin '08 specs.png (6.2 KiB) Viewed 1706 times
Lola B0860 Aston Martin '08 rear.jpg
Lola B0860 Aston Martin '08 side.jpg
Lola B0860 Aston Martin '08 interior.jpg
Nogai211 wrote:The only reason PC is better than Console is because it has Civilization V!
Image
User avatar
死の (Shino)
Mechanic
Mechanic
Posts: 997
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:38 pm
Location: Tsukuba

Nissan R91CK '91
Nissan R91CP '91.jpg
For several seasons Nissan's involvement in Group C was limited to just two rounds of the World Sports Prototype Championship; the 24 Hours of Le Mans and the local race at Fuji. That had to change after 1988 as the FIA declared that teams had to compete in every round of the Championship and could no long 'cherry-pick' their events. Reluctantly the Japanese manufacturer decided to comply with the new demands.

In preparation for the new, much busier season drastic changes were carried out; a new European headquarters was created and more importantly the construction of a brand new car was commissioned. Up until then the chassis for the Nissan engines had been built by March but it was decided starting from a clean sheet was necessary. Fellow Brits Lola won the commission to design and build the 'Nissan R89C.' They had previously constructed the moderately successful Nissan GTP racers.

Although hugely experienced, the R89C or T89/10 as it was known internally, was Lola's first all new Group C car since the T600 series of the early 1980s. The designers were clearly inspired by the Le Mans winning TWR developed Jaguar XJR-9. Underneath the clean and simple exterior shape were deep Venturis to create massive amounts of downforce. The Kevlar and carbon fiber chassis was suspended by double wishbones at the front and rear. Carbone Industries supplied ceramic discs provided the stopping power.

Nissan's biggest contribution, apart from the funding of course, was a development of the twin-Turbo V8 introduced in the 1988 season. The biggest modification was an increase of the stroke resulting in a rise of the displacement from 3 to 3.5 litre. The highly advanced 32-valve unit produced a hefty 800 bhp in endurance specification. In qualification trim it is believed to have produced upwards of 1000 bhp. Mounted amidships, the 'VRH35Z' engine was mated to a Hewland supplied five-speed gearbox.

Dubbed Nissan Motorsports Europe (NME), the new headquarter was set up in Milton Keynes, England, near Silverstone. They would be responsible for running the cars in the World Championship. For Le Mans and the home race, now at Suzuka, additional support was offered by their Japanese counterpart Nismo. While the new Lola
issans were still being readied at NME, the first races were competed by upgraded Nissan (March) R88Cs. The first R89C was completed in May and was ready in time for the Dijon round of the championship where it qualified 6th and finished 15th.

Nissan Motorsport entered three of the new R89Cs in the 24 Hours of Le Mans race backed up by an 88C entered by Yves Courage. During qualifying the cars could do no better than 12th, 15th and 19th. The race proved to be even worse with all three R89C failing to finish; two with engine failures and the other with accident damage. In the remainder of the season a victory was scored in a minor German race. In addition impressive third place finishes were also recorded in the World Championship at Donnington and Spa. Both the pace and reliability improved throughout the season.

Encouraged by the promising results at the the end of 1989, Nissan asked to build six new cars for the 1990 season. Although differing from its predecessor in detail, the car was referred to as the R90C or R90CK (Kae is Japanese for improved). Two cars were entered in the World Championship and a third served as a T-car. At its debut in Monza, the R90CK finished a promising 7th. The 1989 result at Spa was repeated as the new Nissan/Lola took a third after starting from tenth on the grid. Next on the agenda was the 24 Hours of Le Mans where Nissan was present with a record entry of seven cars, including five R90CKs.

Two of the new cars were run by Nissan Motorsport Europe, two by Nissan's American GTP arm NPTI and a one by NISMO. Interestingly none of the cars were identical as they supported various aero packages and parts, like wheels, from different suppliers. During qualifying Mark Blundell set an incredible pole time of 3:27.020 in one of the R90CKs. The car 'suffered' from a stuck wastegaste, which boosted the power to a startling 1100 bhp. The cars were quick during the race as well, setting the fastest lap of 3:40.030. Unfortunately the reliability still wasn't there and three of the five cars retired with mechanical problems. One of the surviving cars finished fifth and the other a distant 17th. The Courage entered R89C reached the finish in 22nd position while another Japanese entered R89C also retired.

After yet another disappointing 24 Hours of Le Mans Nissan completed the mandatory rounds of the World Championship. Despite scoring several podium finishes, the Japanese company decided not to return in 1991. The existing R89s and R90s continued to be campaigned in the All Japanese Sports Prototype Championship the following years but with surprisingly little success. They also appeared in the Daytona 24 Hours in slightly modified form. The cars were regularly upgraded and accordingly were renamed R91 and R92 but they were all old chassis. An exception could be the final R90 chassis that was built up from new as a R91CP and campaigned in FromA livery in Japan.

In Japan a new Group C car was developed to meet the revised 3.5 litre / 750 kg regulations but it appeared only once in a Japanese event. Nissan did return to Le Mans with a variety of cars in the next years but probably never came as close to winning as it had done in 1990. While Nissan kept most of their Group C cars in their highly impressive 'Zama' Nissan Heritage Car Collection, at least three were sold to private collectors. Despite their complexity, all three have been brought to full running order and are regularly seen in historic racing meetings on both sides of the Atlantic.

Specs:
Nissan R91CP '91 specs.png
Nissan R91CP '91 specs.png (7.03 KiB) Viewed 1671 times
Nissan R91CP '91 rear.jpg
Nissan R91CP '91 side.jpg
Nissan R91CP '91 engine.jpg
Last edited by 死の (Shino) on Wed Mar 04, 2015 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Remember: Hacking, not cracking.
User avatar
TheLuigi907
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Japan

Dome S101 Mugen '04
Dome S101 Mugen '04.jpg
At the 1978 Geneva Motorshow, a new Japanese manufacturer, Dome, made a dashing debut. Spelled in Japanese letters Dome means 'a child's dream'. What they unveiled was the striking wedge shaped Zero show car, which drew much inspiration from earlier European prototypes. When for various legal reasons, Dome was unable to turn the Zero into a road car, it was modified for motor racing. Just over a year after the Geneva launch, Dome made its debut in the 24 Hours of Le Mans race, in which they competed for 8 years running.

Fast forward to 2001, when Dome re-appeared on the legendary French track with an all new prototype racer. In the preceding years Dome had concentrated mainly on single seaters, with Formula 1 as the eventual target. Fortunately Dome did not attempt a Formula 1 entry, which has led to big financial problems for small racing car manufacturers in recent years. Success was had in F3000 and the Japanese Touring Car Championship, with a modified Honda NSX. As a consultant Dome helped with various prototypes, including the Jiotto Caspita supercar.

Before Dome returned to Le Mans as a manufacturer in 2001, their work already debuted in 2000; Team Goh entered a Dome modified version of the 1999 Le Mans winning BMW LMP V12. For 2001 a completely new carbon fibre / aluminium honeycomb chassis was developed to accept a variety of engines. The most striking feature of the Dome S101 is the centrally mounted headlight. The rest of the design is quite straightforward and followed the contemporary design trends, but it proved to be highly efficient.

In the hands of 1988 Le Mans winner Jan Lammers, the S101 made a promising first appearance. After qualifying fourth, Lammers briefly led the race, but the factory Audi and Bentley efforts proved too much for the new car. Lammers' Racing For Holland team has since been the most loyal of the S101 racers, competing in another three Le Mans races with their Judd V10 engined Dome. At Le Mans the Domes were destined to fight for the best of the rest spot behind the Audis and Bentleys, but dominated the 2002 FIA World Sportscar Championship and took the overall victory.

In 2002 Mugen launched a new 4 litre sportscar engine, derived from the Mugen/Honda Formula 1 engines. In 2003 and 2004, a Mugen engined Dome formed the only all-Japanese entry in the Le Mans 24 Hours race. The combination proved quick, but fragile. Pictured is the 2004 entry at that year's Le Mans Preliminaries.

Specs:
Dome S101 Mugen '04 specs.png
Dome S101 Mugen '04 specs.png (6.69 KiB) Viewed 1612 times
Dome S101 Mugen '04 rear.jpg
Dome S101 Mugen '04 side.jpg
Image
User avatar
TheLuigi907
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Japan

I never thought I would get the chance to contribute to this without being by just mentioning some rare sports car, thank you for the chance. :mrgreen:
Image
User avatar
Miao
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Res Nullius
Contact:

TheLuigi907 wrote:I never thought I would get the chance to contribute to this without being by just mentioning some rare sports car, thank you for the chance. :mrgreen:
You're welcome. Image

I think it's good to have some car posts made by people other than me and Shino sometimes. :)
Nogai211 wrote:The only reason PC is better than Console is because it has Civilization V!
Image
User avatar
死の (Shino)
Mechanic
Mechanic
Posts: 997
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:38 pm
Location: Tsukuba

Toyota Eagle MKIII IMSA GTP '91
Toyota Eagle MKIII IMSA GTP '91.jpg
The Eagle MkIII is a sports prototype racing car built by All American Racers in 1991 to IMSA GTP specifications. Powered by a turbocharged Toyota inline-4 engine, the car was campaigned in the IMSA Camel GT series by Dan Gurney's Toyota-sponsored AAR team from 1991 through to the end of 1993. The Eagle MkIII won 21 out of the 27 races in which it was entered and is considered one of the most successful and technologically-advanced designs of the IMSA GTP era — "a car that proved so overwhelmingly dominant that the class for which it was created has now been assigned to history", according to Racer magazine.

In addition to the program's funding, Toyota also supplied the MkIII's four-cylinder engine. This was a further development of the production-derived unit also found in the earlier GTP cars and also the GTO Celica. Displacing just over 2.1 litres, it featured twin overhead camshafts and four valves per cylinder. Thanks to a sizeable turbocharger, it produced in excess in 750 hp. Reportedly, it was so powerful that Toyota Racing Development (TRD) destroyed four dynamometers testing and preparing the 3S-GTM engines. Responsible for transferring all this power to the rear wheels was a March-sourced five-speed gearbox.

Completed in the summer of 1991, the all-new Toyota Eagle tipped the scales at the 875 kg minimum weight stipulated by the regulations. The highly efficient machine produced in excess of 3,000 kg of downforce at speeds of over 300 km/h. Quick straight out of the box, Juan Manuel Fangio II looked set to claim a debut victory at Laguna Seca in July of 1991 only to be caught out by a mis-timed pit stop. He did win a week later at Portland and again at the Del Mar season finale. Here the first Mk III was joined by a second example, piloted by Rocky Moran. He did not make it to the finish after a hefty shunt.

Specs:
Toyota Eagle MKIII IMSA GTP '91 specs.png
Toyota Eagle MKIII IMSA GTP '91 specs.png (6.64 KiB) Viewed 1536 times
Toyota Eagle MKIII IMSA GTP '91 rear.jpg
Toyota Eagle MKIII IMSA GTP '91 side.jpg
Toyota Eagle MKIII IMSA GTP '91 interior.jpg
Image
Remember: Hacking, not cracking.
User avatar
Miao
Drift King
Drift King
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:24 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Res Nullius
Contact:

BMW V12 LMR '99
BMW V12 LMR '99.jpg
BMW scored a surprise victory in the 1995 24 Hours of Le Mans as an engine supplier to McLaren. In the following two seasons the German manufacturer's 'Motorsport' department increased their interest in sports car racing. During the 1997 season BMW even ran a works team with the latest 'Longtail' version of the McLaren. Although several victories were scored in the FIA GT Championship, the writing was on the wall for the production based road car. The likes of Porsche, Toyota and Mercedes-Benz were lining up their purpose-built GT racers and open prototypes were also making a grand return especially in the long distance events. BMW opted to continue their sports car racing involvement with a bespoke prototype in 1998. The goal was another outright win at Le Mans but time was limited as the German company had already signed a deal with Williams to enter F1 in 2000.

Instead of going at it themselves, BMW enlisted the help of their new partners Williams to help design the new racing car. The British racing team's design department, headed by Patrick Head, developed a straightforward carbon fiber sports racer around the Le Mans winning BMW V12 engine. Front and rear suspension were by double wishbones and push-rods that actuated the longitudinally mounted coil spring and damper units. Mounted amidships was the latest incarnation of the S70 V12 that had originally been designed as a road car engine. It displaced just under 6-liter and with restrictors fitted produced around 580 bhp. Power was transferred to the rear wheels through a X-Trac supplied six speed sequential gearbox. The rolling chassis was covered in a rather bland carbon fiber body. The most striking feature was the kidney-style grille reminiscent of BMW's road cars.

Dubbed the 'V12 LM,' the new BMW 'Le Mans Prototype' was entrusted to Schnitzer Motorsport for that year's 24 Hours of Le Mans. The two-car team made its first appearance at the Le Mans Prequalifying in May of 1998. They clocked the 11th and 20th fastest times, so work was still needed for Le Mans a month later. In qualifying the V12 LM proved more competitive, clinching a 6th and 12th grid position. The race was nothing short of a disaster as both cars were forced to retire just over four hours into the race. The rear wheel bearings had failed on both cars. The V12 LM was not raced again that season as BMW and Williams were hard at work developing a more competitive replacement. At the start of 1999 the two cars were fitted with slightly restyled bodies and sold to privateers. The V12 LMs were campaigned with limited success in the following years.

New at the game, BMW and Williams had been relatively conservative with the design of the V12 LM. A year's worth of lessons and a better understanding of the regulations resulted in the much more ambitious V12 LMR. It was easily distinguishable from its predecessor by the single roll-over hoop. A very creative interpretation of the regulations, this provided a much cleaner airflow to the rear wing. The section between the front fenders was also much lower to funnel air to the radiators mounted in the side-pods. This was part of the complete rework of the car's cooling architecture, which was originally fed from underneath. Further revisions included a raised footbox and the use of a single air-intake for the V12. Mechanically very little was changed. The V12 LMR weighed in well under the 900 kg minimum weight, so ballast could be used in strategic positions to improve handling.

Leaving little to chance, BMW decided to debut the new car early in 1999 at the Sebring 12 Hours race. The thorough redesign proved to be very effective as the two white machines qualified first and third for the race. At the end of the race the JJ Lehto, Jorg Muller and Tom Kristensen piloted machine scored BMW's very first outright win at Sebring. With high hopes the team traveled to Le Mans with two V12 LMRs. After qualifying third and sixth against very strong opposition, the two cars were found near the head of the field for most of the race. In the closing stages the #17 suffered a massive accident at the Porsche Curves due to a stuck throttle. By that time the surviving #15 car had fortunately taken the lead thanks to a combination of pace and relatively low fuel consumption. In a thrilling finale, it was closely chased by one of the Toyota GT-Ones until a puncture freed the way for BMW's first Le Mans win. The very tight schedule had been met with flying colors.

After Le Mans, the cars were shipped back to North America to compete in the remaining American Le Mans Series rounds. Here the V12 LMR added a further three race wins to its tally. Reluctant to retire the highly successful and competitive sports racer, BMW decided to campaign the V12 LMR in 2000 alongside the Formula 1 program. With little development and an ever stronger Audi presence, the class of 1999 struggled in 2000. Only two more victories were scored. It was clear that BMW had lost interest when no cars were entered to defend the Le Mans title. At the end of the year, the surviving cars were retired. In its short career, the V12 LMR had achieved all the objectives set, winning the two major endurance races. It also had a lasting effect on prototype design as all subsequent 'LMPs' had a single roll-over hoop until they were banned in 2006.

Specs:
BMW V12 LMR '99 specs.png
BMW V12 LMR '99 specs.png (5.85 KiB) Viewed 1511 times
BMW V12 LMR '99 rear.jpg
BMW V12 LMR '99 side.jpg
BMW V12 LMR '99 interior.jpg
Nogai211 wrote:The only reason PC is better than Console is because it has Civilization V!
Image
User avatar
TheLuigi907
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Japan

Nissan R88C '88
Nissan R88C.jpg
Nissan gently rolled into Group C racing in 1983 by supplying an engine to Hoshino Racing for a privately run entry in the Japanese national series. The engine was a turbocharged 'four', which was mounted in a customer March chassis. Although the results were not very encouraging, Nissan's interest was sparked and in 1985 Nissan Motorsport or Nismo was established. Several new March chassis were acquired and fitted with a development of the V6 engine used in the United States by the Electramotive team.

As part of the increased efforts, Nismo co-commissioned a brand new chassis from March for 1986. The other commissioner was BMW of North America for their IMSA GTP campaign. Dubbed the 86G, the new sports racer was designed by former McLaren engineer Gordon Coppuck using sophisticated CAD/CAM computer software. The chassis was a monocoque constructed from aluminium sheets with a honeycomb core. The cars constructed for Nissan featured a lightweight titanium front roll hoop. A major departure from earlier March Group C and GTP cars was the adoption of side-mounted radiators, which allowed for much cleaner aerodynamics.

Four chassis with gearboxes were shipped to Japan for completion at Nismo's new facilities. Here they were fitted with the same Electramotive derived engine already used during the previous year. As stipulated in the IMSA GTP regulations, the V6 was based on a Nissan production engine. Group C had no such restrictions, so the engine could be thoroughly reworked. The biggest change was replacing the original cast iron block with an aluminium one. It was also fitted with twin Garrett turbochargers compared to the single turbo used in the GTP spec. On full boost the 3-litre V6 was reputed to produce around 1000 hp. In race tune it was still good for close to 700 hp.

Clothed in an elegant, March developed bodywork, the new cars were officially badged 'Nissan R86V'. The first example debuted in a local race at Suzuka but did not even make it to the start due to a fire in practice. It was sent to Le Mans alongside an earlier Nissan/March 85G. The high profile entry was up against it from the start due to struggles within the Japanese and British members of team. A 16th place finish for the earlier car was but a small consolation for all the efforts. Once back in Japan the R86V that raced at Le Mans was joined by the other three cars in the Fuji 1000 km race, which counted for the World Championship. Two survived and finished a lowly 10th and 11th.

Undeterred by the poor showing in 1986 Nismo ventured on and developed a brand new V8 engine for 1987. It was designed from the ground up as a racing engine with an eye on getting both better performance figures and fuel mileage. Like the outgoing V6, the 'VEJ30' engine displaced 3 litres. Twin IHI turbos were fitted to provide the necessary boost. Nissan now had an exclusive deal with March and took delivery of three 87G chassis, which featured small improvements over the 1986 cars. With the new engine installed the new machines were dubbed 'Nissan R87E'.

With Le Mans once again the sole objective, Nissan opted not to run their new cars in any of the World Championship rounds held ahead of the race. A single entry in the Fuji 500 km was again the only preparation event for the team. The R87E failed to finish due to an engine failure. Two of the new cars and a single, privately entered R86V were shipped to Le Mans. Once again the Japanese manufacturer failed to impress with the new cars running well behind the leaders when both engines expired. The R86V also retired from the race early. Back in Japan, the three cars were raced several more times with a sixth for the R87E and a commendable fourth for the old R86V as the best results.

Apparently the new engine was blamed for the poor results and the Nismo engineers were sent back to the drawing boards. The result was the VRH30, which had similar specifications as the VEJ30 but only the crankshaft design was carried over. Again fitted with IHI turbos, the new V8 engine was good for over 750 hp in race trim. No new tubs were ordered from March as quietly the ties between the two companies were severed. Two of each the 86G and 87G chassis were adapted to fit the VRH30 engine. Among the mechanical modifications was a lengthening of the wheelbase. For the first time Nismo worked on the cars aerodynamics as well and developed a new body in the wind-tunnel. The latest Nissans were dubbed the R88C.

Specs:
Nissan R88C specs.png
Nissan R88C specs.png (6.62 KiB) Viewed 1448 times
Nissan R88C rear.jpg
Nissan R88C side.jpg
Nissan R88C interior.jpg
Image
User avatar
TheLuigi907
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 492
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Japan

Thiss time it was a triumph, I did not need help from anyone to find the specs. :P
Image
Post Reply

Return to “The Showroom”